Roger_Roger
Trusted Contributor
- Messages
- 412
Has there been a new Facility Priority List published too?
Figured it was updated with the ppt, no?
Has there been a new Facility Priority List published too?
Can ZAU release anyone?Has there been a new Facility Priority List published too?
Not yet. It'll be titled December. The good news is the Natl AOB is 82.0 which is a full 2% increase in the last 5 months or so. The agency will likely see this as an indication the temp rules are working as intended. But the higher that number climbs the more likely they are to ease up on movement restrictions.Has there been a new Facility Priority List published too?
Placement Tool shows 0 losses.Can ZAU release anyone?
Dislike buttonPlacement Tool shows 0 losses.
It's means that there is something preventing them from selecting based on the current "temporary" rules .So if a facility is showing possible gains but 0 in the NCEPT target column does that mean they are not picking anyone up?
Dude, I feel you. This process is beyond frustrating. What facility are you referring to? Not all of the rules are hard and fast. It's not impossible for a facility that shows 0 in the column in question to select if it's due to the projected staffing being above 85% or the trainee ratio being above 30% as those will be considered on a "case by case" basis.Great. I give up.
Can SCT pick anyone up?
Dude, I feel you. This process is beyond frustrating. What facility are you referring to? Not all of the rules are hard and fast. It's not impossible for a facility that shows 0 in the column in question to select if it's due to the projected staffing being above 85% or the trainee ratio being above 30% as those will be considered on a "case by case" basis.
I doubt facilities know the whereabouts of ERR’s you have in for.I'm open to several facilities which I think might make things worse. I think they are hesitant to select folks with multiple ERRs for fear that that's not where they really want to be or to just use that facility to get somewhere else. Plus, I think the more seniority you have the worse your chances of being selected are.
I agree with the seniority part. I’ve heard of facility FACREPs picking up low seniority ERRs to bump everyone at the facilities seniority and not wanting to pick up high seniority guys.I'm open to several facilities which I think might make things worse. I think they are hesitant to select folks with multiple ERRs for fear that that's not where they really want to be or to just use that facility to get somewhere else. Plus, I think the more seniority you have the worse your chances of being selected are.
Each facility is allowed to select however they see fit. The seniority thing is likely an issue at certain places and was certainly an issue at certain places under the old system as well.if a facility can select, the ATM can see other facilities lists. Both ranked and unranked. They can 100% see where you have paperwork.
I had numerous FacReps and ATMs mention this during the last round proving that they can see. One said they “didn’t want to select me and ruin my chances for a preferred facility that might be a lower priority” They still ranked me high, but it could have cost me the position.
I agree this practice really hurts some people as they may really want to work in all those locations, but might get put low on the list as the FacRep or ATM feels they aren’t serious.
Can SCT pick anyone up?
Awesome, my level 5 tower now has a 64% pass rate...we are so good here...