December (Q1) 2020

JNev

Trusted Contributor
FAA
Messages
436
Facility
BWI Baltimore Tower
People from MRY have in for: DALx3, CRQ, SAN, SNA, NCT, IAH, HOU, PHX, MCO, ORD, MDW, PWK, MSP, and VNY
 

fknlo

Active Member
Messages
75
they can’t? cuz I’m pulling for there too
I don't believe so but I'm not even close to 100% sure. I feel like my only real hope is that I could be one of the "special circumstance" exceptions or whatever as I'd hopefully be able to waiver past the training department if they put me in my old area.
 

Alpha_bravo2

Trusted Contributor
FAA
Messages
213
Facility
PNS Pensacola Tower
This is just speculation on my part but I think the special circumstances has more to do with a facility release someone to a facility above 85%. Just a guess on my part.

I have in for 9 facilities but the only one able to select under the latest rules would be MIA. I'm hoping that being CAT 1 will mean something come selection time.
 

axman

Active Member
Messages
139
I don’t know if this clarifies anything for anyone but this was from someone close to the NCEPT process:
“Once all of the gaining facilities hit 85% projected, they only moved additional people to them if the losing facility was over 100% and it made sense.”
 

Alpha_bravo2

Trusted Contributor
FAA
Messages
213
Facility
PNS Pensacola Tower
Did anyone actually figure out what gained and lost due to the "extraordinary circumstances" on the last panel.
 

tonyandmanda

Member
Messages
10
I don’t know if this clarifies anything for anyone but this was from someone close to the NCEPT process:
“Once all of the gaining facilities hit 85% projected, they only moved additional people to them if the losing facility was over 100% and it made sense.”
This makes sense because I actually looked at the last panel and evaluated it (yes I’m that bored) and 14 facilities picked up people where the gaining facility was above 85%, but below 90%, and the losing facility was above 100% (most well over 100%). One losing facility had a 96% projected I believe but it was to OAK, so that make sense why they got picked. Most of them seemed to be region to region too. Like a smaller facility in the same region moved up to a higher level.

14 people selected above the 85% is actually pretty good I think with only 80 selections. Seems like most people are thinking there’s a zero chance. It’s definitely a possibility if your facility is projected well over 100%.
 

Mikeyanker

Member
FAA
Messages
29
Facility
STL St. Louis Tower
This makes sense because I actually looked at the last panel and evaluated it (yes I’m that bored) and 14 facilities picked up people where the gaining facility was above 85%, but below 90%, and the losing facility was above 100% (most well over 100%). One losing facility had a 96% projected I believe but it was to OAK, so that make sense why they got picked. Most of them seemed to be region to region too. Like a smaller facility in the same region moved up to a higher level.

14 people selected above the 85% is actually pretty good I think with only 80 selections. Seems like most people are thinking there’s a zero chance. It’s definitely a possibility if your facility is projected well over 100%.
I appreciate your boredom. Lol. Hoping CVG gets a second round shot since we are at 97% proj.... I guess there’s a little hope.
 

Flyaboveall

Member
Messages
53
I don’t know if this clarifies anything for anyone but this was from someone close to the NCEPT process:
“Once all of the gaining facilities hit 85% projected, they only moved additional people to them if the losing facility was over 100% and it made sense.”
Any word on them letting up on that? Maybe going back to the original rules of NCEPT?

This makes sense because I actually looked at the last panel and evaluated it (yes I’m that bored) and 14 facilities picked up people where the gaining facility was above 85%, but below 90%, and the losing facility was above 100% (most well over 100%). One losing facility had a 96% projected I believe but it was to OAK, so that make sense why they got picked. Most of them seemed to be region to region too. Like a smaller facility in the same region moved up to a higher level.

14 people selected above the 85% is actually pretty good I think with only 80 selections. Seems like most people are thinking there’s a zero chance. It’s definitely a possibility if your facility is projected well over 100%.
Any selections to facilities over 90% projected? Seems like they only filled to the national average after filling facilities first to 85%
 

tonyandmanda

Member
Messages
10
Any word on them letting up on that? Maybe going back to the original rules of NCEPT?



Any selections to facilities over 90% projected? Seems like they only filled to the national average after filling facilities first to 85%
There were no selections over 90% on the last panel. The highest was 89.6 I believe.
 
Top