February (Q2) 2025

[22papa]

Yes you’re a tard because some clown came on here and claimed he used to work at a place and knew a guy he thinks filed an err and that guy didn’t get picked so there must be some dynamic corruption yada yada and you just believed him. Like a child. I didn’t provide a “logical explanation” because there isn’t one. The explanation is he made it up. And you should be shaming such idiots off the streets. But instead you’re attacking the guy that called out his bullshit cuz you thought I was mean about it. Trump would be so disappointed in you.
What’s your question

It wasn’t any corruption. You just need to relax man, it’s not that big of a deal because it’s fixable if you talk to the right people and don’t act like an asshole for no reason.

Mistakes were made with their staffing before the SWB deadline as well as after the deadline when they got it fixed, which affected the selection process. Mistakes happen. It’s ok.

 

[Move78]

It wasn’t any corruption. You just need to relax man, it’s not that big of a deal because it’s fixable if you talk to the right people and don’t act like an asshole for no reason.

Mistakes were made with their staffing before the SWB deadline as well as after the deadline when they got it fixed, which affected the selection process. Mistakes happen. It’s ok.

So what happened to your ‘know for a fact’ nonsense?

I’d argue over make believe things too I guess if my base was less than 100k. Makes people angry

Wish we could get a raise. Maybe people would argue less about dumb shit

This kid’s never been to a center

 

[22papa]

So what happened to your ‘know for a fact’ nonsense?

I was correct. The person should’ve been available to be selected and it’s now been taken care of. Thank you for all your help and great insight you’ve provided though.

 

[SquawkHijack]

I was correct. The person should’ve been available to be selected and it’s now been taken care of. Thank you for all your help and great insight you’ve provided though.

Nope it was all made up you’re wrong lmao

 

[Move78]

I was correct. The person should’ve been available to be selected and it’s now been taken care of. Thank you for all your help and great insight you’ve provided though.

What’d ya fix bud?

 

[jdatc]

What’d ya fix bud?

perhaps you should review our union’s code of conduct?

EXPECTED BEHAVIOR​

NATCA expects its staff, its members, its leadership and any other participants at NATCA activities, events, or meetings to:

• Respect others and their views
• Recognize and value individual differences
• Not engage in aggressive, bullying, or intimidating behavior
• Not engage in discriminatory or harassing behavior

UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR​

This Code of Conduct is not intended to restrict free and open debate, but rather is concerned with preventing unacceptable behavior, as detailed below. Unacceptable behavior includes, but is not limited to, the following:

• Discriminatory or harassing speech or actions, including cyber-bullying or cyber-harassment, in the NATCA workplace or at any NATCA meeting or event, including all related activities

 

[TS]

It wasn’t any corruption. You just need to relax man, it’s not that big of a deal because it’s fixable if you talk to the right people and don’t act like an asshole for no reason.

Mistakes were made with their staffing before the SWB deadline as well as after the deadline when they got it fixed, which affected the selection process. Mistakes happen. It’s ok.

I typically don’t post however after talking with the rep at SAT and reviewing the panel nothing you have stated is factual. SAT had 2 on their list. BDL was red by the selection to CMH and PVD was selected to AUS. There were no additional selections or errors regarding SAT. The 3rd person on the demand sheet did pulled their ERR prior to the panel.

 

[SquawkHijack]

perhaps you should review our union’s code of conduct?

EXPECTED BEHAVIOR​

NATCA expects its staff, its members, its leadership and any other participants at NATCA activities, events, or meetings to:

• Respect others and their views
• Recognize and value individual differences
• Not engage in aggressive, bullying, or intimidating behavior
• Not engage in discriminatory or harassing behavior

UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR​

This Code of Conduct is not intended to restrict free and open debate, but rather is concerned with preventing unacceptable behavior, as detailed below. Unacceptable behavior includes, but is not limited to, the following:

• Discriminatory or harassing speech or actions, including cyber-bullying or cyber-harassment, in the NATCA workplace or at any NATCA meeting or event, including all related activities

I’d hate to have panel questions and have to consult that stunning professional.

I typically don’t post however after talking with the rep at SAT and reviewing the panel nothing you have stated is factual. SAT had 2 on their list. BDL was red by the selection to CMH and PVD was selected to AUS. There were no additional selections or errors regarding SAT. The 3rd person on the demand sheet did pulled their ERR prior to the panel.

Thank you for the info!

If only Move78 could’ve just said this instead of being an ass and derailing the thread per usual.

 

[Move78]

jdatc ah yes the king of the useless internet trolls comes to defend the internet trolls. This guy’s spreading misinformation you idiots should be shouting him down.

Damn, he’s a regional NCEPT rep and acts like that? I’d hate to have panel questions and have to consult that stunning professional.

Thank you for the info!

If only Move78 could’ve just said this instead of being an ass and derailing the thread per usual.

Never heard of her

 

[TS]

perhaps you should review our union’s code of conduct?

EXPECTED BEHAVIOR​

NATCA expects its staff, its members, its leadership and any other participants at NATCA activities, events, or meetings to:

• Respect others and their views
• Recognize and value individual differences
• Not engage in aggressive, bullying, or intimidating behavior
• Not engage in discriminatory or harassing behavior

UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR​

This Code of Conduct is not intended to restrict free and open debate, but rather is concerned with preventing unacceptable behavior, as detailed below. Unacceptable behavior includes, but is not limited to, the following:

• Discriminatory or harassing speech or actions, including cyber-bullying or cyber-harassment, in the NATCA workplace or at any NATCA meeting or event, including all related activities

code of conduct applies to a public forum now? If that’s the case someone should do some reviews for the members here and other anonymous forums. Also, posting false information based on rumors is pretty irritating as a rep. If more people would do the research and ask the questions instead of assuming they know or being experts maybe we wouldn’t have some of the issues we currently face as a union.

 

[22papa]

I typically don’t post however after talking with the rep at SAT and reviewing the panel nothing you have stated is factual. SAT had 2 on their list. BDL was red by the selection to CMH and PVD was selected to AUS. There were no additional selections or errors regarding SAT. The 3rd person on the demand sheet did pulled their ERR prior to the panel.

Yes, there was supposed to be a 4th person but the ATM fucked up the SWB. It was then fixed after the official numbers got posted for the panel but for some reason not all facilities seemed to have got the updated version, hence why someone was still picked up from that facility later down the line by a place that did have it properly updated.

jdatc ah yes the king of the useless internet trolls comes to defend the internet trolls. This guy’s spreading misinformation you idiots should be shouting him down.

I’d love to know which one you are. Probably the same useless one that I tried to email and then another ncept rep from a different region literally had to jump in and do everything for you.

 

[TS]

Yes, there was supposed to be a 4th person but the ATM fucked up the SWB. It was then fixed after the official numbers got posted for the panel but for some reason not all facilities seemed to have got the updated version, hence why someone was still picked up from that facility later down the line by a place that did have it properly updated.

THERE WAS NO ERRs on file left for SAT. So unless their err was not added by hr correctly your information is wrong. No one was selected later to SAT. It’s my region brother I would know.

 

[SteveMcCroskey]

 

[22papa]

THERE WAS NO ERRs on file left for SAT. So unless their err was not added by hr correctly your information is wrong. No one was selected later to SAT. It’s my region brother I would know.

There’s literally 9 ERRs on file to SAT according to the demand sheet? And yes HR fucked up on top of the ATM’s initial fuck up.

 

[jdatc]

code of conduct applies to a public forum now? If that’s the case someone should do some reviews for the members here and other anonymous forums. Also, posting false information based on rumors is pretty irritating as a rep. If more people would do the research and ask the questions instead of assuming they know or being experts maybe we wouldn’t have some of the issues we currently face as a union.

Maybe we need the BBS back then? I’m all for it.

Anonymity is a double edged sword.

People that post on here that want to talk down to people from a perceived position of authority shouldn’t be afraid to out themselves then if it’s such a problem correcting misinformation.

My regions old ARVP was a shiny example of this when his ass got doxxed.

You can have anonymity or credibility. Choose one.

 

[TS]

Maybe we need the BBS back then? I’m all for it.

Anonymity is a double edged sword.

People that post on here that want to talk down to people from a perceived position of authority shouldn’t be afraid to out themselves then if it’s such a problem correcting misinformation.

My regions old ARVP was a shiny example of this when his ass got doxxed.

You can shave anonymity or credibility. Choose one.

Which is why I’m here to correct misinformation about my region specifically.

There’s literally 9 ERRs on file to SAT according to the demand sheet?

I said errs left meaning the facility is also releasable. 4 ERRs in the database were from green buildings based on the last dump. 1 was previously selected so it’s invalid. 1 removed his ERR pre-panel. 2 were ranked and selections were made as previously posted.

Maybe we need the BBS back then? I’m all for it.

Anonymity is a double edged sword.

People that post on here that want to talk down to people from a perceived position of authority shouldn’t be afraid to out themselves then if it’s such a problem correcting misinformation.

My regions old ARVP was a shiny example of this when his ass got doxxed.

You can have anonymity or credibility. Choose one.

Point me at the building and we will find a mistake if there is one. But based on what the NCEPT team knows currently there’s nothing to fix.

 

[jdatc]

Which is why I’m here to correct misinformation about my region specifically.

That’s good, but then you limit people who try and view your profile.

I’m all for correcting the misinformation, but to do it effectively you often have to give up that anonymity.

That’s a reason it’s so easy also to post misinformation; anonymity.

 

[Move78]

Maybe we need the BBS back then? I’m all for it.

Anonymity is a double edged sword.

People that post on here that want to talk down to people from a perceived position of authority shouldn’t be afraid to out themselves then if it’s such a problem correcting misinformation.

My regions old ARVP was a shiny example of this when his ass got doxxed.

You can have anonymity or credibility. Choose one.

He’s posting misinformation. But you love that shit. Anything to tear it all down on your way out the door. And leave the next generation with the bill.

 

[jdatc]

He’s posting misinformation. But you love that shit. Anything to tear it all down on your way out the door. And leave the next generation with the bill.

You have a chip on your shoulder, I don’t know why, but perhaps posting on here talking down to people makes you feel better about something else in your life, kudos! I know trolling fills me with glee too.

However, if I really really wanted to burn it down, I would have already. I may have that capability. I chose not to try in round one.

But, if we keep going down this path, there won’t be anything left to burn down anyway.

And guess what, you will be just as culpable as I with your attitude but at least I can admit it.

 

[TS]

That’s good, but then you limit people who try and view your profile.

I’m all for correcting the misinformation, but to do it effectively you often have to give up that anonymity.

That’s a reason it’s so easy also to post misinformation; anonymity.

You can’t see my previous comments on my profile? I don’t use these forums often but I have no reason to hide who I am my username is my initials as well.