Their current CPC to target is 86.2%, so they can only release.Are you missing SEA for the round 1 gaining, or is there some dynamic decision at play that I didn't see?
Their current CPC to target is 86.2%, so they can only release.Are you missing SEA for the round 1 gaining, or is there some dynamic decision at play that I didn't see?
Yeah. Going through quickly looks like this for round 1:
Gaining:
View attachment 7292
Losing:
View attachment 7294
Round 2 Losing:
View attachment 7295
Round 2 Gaining:
View attachment 7296
edit: MN’s response is more accurateCan’t APA pick up 1 to get to 100% projected in Round 2 since it’s a level 8? Don’t see it on your list unless I’m missing something too
What I put on the list doesn't take into consideration of what might happen in round 1. A facility can only either gain OR release per round now. From what I gather looking at the rules, APA can only gain in round 2 only if there are 2 releases from there in round 1. However, would they really do this? Who is to say those 2 releases actually accept TOLs? NCEPT is dumb.Can’t APA pick up 1 to get to 100% projected in Round 2 since it’s a level 8? Don’t see it on your list unless I’m missing something too
ZSE should be included in this. Their Projected % to target is 88.976, which is .069 less than the national average.Yeah. Going through quickly looks like this for round 1:
Gaining:
View attachment 7292
Losing:
View attachment 7294
Round 2 Losing:
View attachment 7295
Round 2 Gaining:
View attachment 7296
nice.069
Boys……. stop all driving yourselves nuts and analyzing this shit at such an abstract level. The “rules” might be what the “rules” are for this panel but you know they are going to do whatever the fuck they want and honor whatever side deals they made anyway.ZSE should be included in this. Their Projected % to target is 88.976, which is .069 less than the national average.
If this isn’t more true. It’s like dems and republicans meeting together to decide who gets selected. Some dynamic decisions will be madeBoys……. stop all driving yourselves nuts and analyzing this shit at such an abstract level. The “rules” might be what the “rules” are for this panel but you know they are going to do whatever the fuck they want and honor whatever side deals they made anyway.
No way they are going to put 2% of the effort you all are doing to analyze it and make sure it’s done exactly right or fair, so don’t get this wrapped up.
Stop talking dirty to meDynamic decisions baby
Gains-to-target and gains-to-avg are how many people the facility would have to gain to make its projected staffing number equal the target staffing number, and how many it would have to gain to make its projected staffing percentage equal the national average of all facility projected staffing percentages.Question, is the 1/1/22 placement list locked in for the NCEPT about to come out or is one issued separately for that?
Also what does "possible gains to target" or "possible gains to national average" mean?
Thanks, I guess that doesn’t mean they are specifically picking anyone up though this round? Trying to figure it out since I have reinstatement paperwork in to this place but it’s “overstaffed”Gains-to-target and gains-to-avg are how many people the facility would have to gain to make its projected staffing number equal the target staffing number, and how many it would have to gain to make its projected staffing percentage equal the national average of all facility projected staffing percentages.
Not sure about the placement list question.
Jan 26th is the Priority placement tool being used for this ncept. If you look at it. It will tell you who likely can pick up and who can release. Someone else in the thread earlier combed through the data and set a list of which facilities can do whatWhen are they going to officially designate whether a facility can release or only gain?
Guess I'll be SOL on this panel lol. Guess I'll be watching yet someone else get their ticket out...Nobody is guaranteed anything. Especially since the PHL timeline has been pushed back