September (Q4) 2019

[But_I_Had_Visual]

That is absolutely brutal.

Basically same story at my facility, would’ve had probably at least 2-3 Cat 2 releases.... now it’s none. I’m not salty about it though

 

[aviate12]

Soooo...who all put in for CVG?

Me too. I was thinking it wasn't that popular.

 

[But_I_Had_Visual]

Me too. I was thinking it wasn't that popular.

Easily be at least 25 people with paperwork in for CVG

 

[aviate12]

Easily be at least 25 people with paperwork in for CVG

Got it, I guess the question will be how many are eligible for release.

 

[Shikaka]

255 possible losses out of all facilities, I imagine people were submitting for those that could pick up people. I'm interested how they're gonna play it with 125 possible gains. Time to bust out the chapstick and throat lozenges and start getting friendly.

 

[rhombus]

255 possible losses out of all facilities, I imagine people were submitting for those that could pick up people. I'm interested how they're gonna play it with 125 possible gains. Time to bust out the chapstick and throat lozenges and start getting friendly.

Where are you getting 125 possible gains from? When you change the Projected % to Target number to 85% and remove N90, C90, and ZNY, you're left with only 60 possible selections. And when you remove some of the facilities that have a trainee ratio of over 30% it's probably somewhere in the 50's.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the new rules but since CVG is projected at 90.8% aren't they ineligible to pick anyone up?

Requests for transfer to Facility Pay Level (FPL) 9 and below facilities up to 100% of the projected CPC to target percentage will only be considered for extenuating circumstances after all other ERR requests have been reviewed.

It's gonna be interesting to find out what exactly an extenuating circumstance is.

 

[CaptainObvious]

Where are you getting 125 possible gains from? When you change the Projected % to Target number to 85% and remove N90, C90, and ZNY, you're left with only 60 possible selections. And when you remove some of the facilities that have a trainee ratio of over 30% it's probably somewhere in the 50's.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the new rules but since CVG is projected at 90.8% aren't they ineligible to pick anyone up?

Requests for transfer to Facility Pay Level (FPL) 9 and below facilities up to 100% of the projected CPC to target percentage will only be considered for extenuating circumstances after all other ERR requests have been reviewed.

It's gonna be interesting to find out what exactly an extenuating circumstance is.

You can’t define such a dynamic term like “extenuating”. It’ll just be handled at the table in real time.

 

[BCHOOSIER]

Easily be at least 25 people with paperwork in for CVG

27

 

[jdatc]

27

91 movements.

I just made that number up, and that’s why it will be correct. Forget the ppt, priorities and everything else. Get out your magic 8 ball.

 

[BCHOOSIER]

91 movements.

I just made that number up, and that’s why it will be correct. Forget the ppt, priorities and everything else. Get out your magic 8 ball.

No, magic 8 ball needed...27 is the number.

 

[aviate12]

No, magic 8 ball needed...27 is the number.

27 people that can be released? Or 27 ERR's total.

 

[AZNLUVR69]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the new rules but since CVG is projected at 90.8% aren't they ineligible to pick anyone up?

CVG is project at 76%, not 90%.

 

[Shikaka]

Where are you getting 125 possible gains from? When you change the Projected % to Target number to 85% and remove N90, C90, and ZNY, you're left with only 60 possible selections. And when you remove some of the facilities that have a trainee ratio of over 30% it's probably somewhere in the 50's.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the new rules but since CVG is projected at 90.8% aren't they ineligible to pick anyone up?

Requests for transfer to Facility Pay Level (FPL) 9 and below facilities up to 100% of the projected CPC to target percentage will only be considered for extenuating circumstances after all other ERR requests have been reviewed.

It's gonna be interesting to find out what exactly an extenuating circumstance is.

My excel skills are showing...should be 715 possible gains on the priority tool with 255 possible losses. It's all on the Vacancy and Priority tool, the corrected one.

Funny how it resembles the poor staffing issue, not enough people to fill holes still.

 

[rhombus]

CVG is project at 76%, not 90%.

Ah shi*t you're right. My bad. That makes it 5 selections up to 85%.

My excel skills are showing...should be 715 possible gains on the priority tool with 255 possible losses. It's all on the Vacancy and Priority tool, the corrected one.

Funny how it resembles the poor staffing issue, not enough people to fill holes still.

I'm not 100% sure the new vacancy and priority list is conforming to the rules for this panel. ZNY has a trainee ratio over 30% and is still showing 157 gains. HCF is over 30% as well and is showing 8 selections, etc. Who knows.

 

[Shikaka]

rhombus maybe they're showing their hand with the predicted exceptions, I'm expecting it to be fairly dynamic

 

[Mike Kilo]

rhombus maybe they're showing their hand with the predicted exceptions, I'm expecting it to be un-fairly “do whatever the fuck we want”.

Fixed it for ya ?.

 

[Cowboy]

Fixed it for ya ?.

??????

 

[AZNLUVR69]

27

27 applied for CVG?

 

[Super Salt]

The answers you all seek will be shown after September 30th ??????

 

[N737ER]

The answers you all seek will be shown after September 30th ??????

Naw, there will just be more unanswered questions ?