FightingIrish2012
Legendary Member
- Messages
- 2,028
I know that guy, he just got a hardship to MCO approved.Until that guy takes the sup job ?
I know that guy, he just got a hardship to MCO approved.Until that guy takes the sup job ?
I don’t know that guy.I know that guy, he just got a hardship to MCO approved.
If it gives you a release and you are able to notify the panel before they convene it can be adjusted.if we certified someone last week, can someone go this panel?
we are above numbers required
But managers don’t rank people who were not able to release?If it gives you a release and you are able to notify the panel before they convene it can be adjusted.
Correct, manager rankings don't really mean anything though.But managers don’t rank people who were not able to release?
Correct, manager rankings don't really mean anything though.
NCEPT SOP 3.4.1This is 100% untrue.
Evidence please. Show where they have chosen someone ranked lower on a list, and not because the people above them could no longer be selected because of the of their facility already releasing someone.NCEPT SOP 3.4.1
"If applicable, facilities will prioritize all candidates and return their lists to ASG within five (5) business days. Prioritized lists are for reference purposes only."
The panels regularly don't care about the ATM Ranking lists.
Cert has to be at or before 1/25if we certified someone last week, can someone go this panel?
we are above numbers required
This is untrue the rankings determine who gets selected within whatever other parameters they made up for that moment in timeNCEPT SOP 3.4.1
"If applicable, facilities will prioritize all candidates and return their lists to ASG within five (5) business days. Prioritized lists are for reference purposes only."
The panels regularly don't care about the ATM Ranking lists.
Nothing is adjusted after the 1/26 PPT unless it was supposed to be data from before 1/26.If it gives you a release and you are able to notify the panel before they convene it can be adjusted.
Thank youCert has to be at or before 1/25
Bro your Haz profile pic is amazing and I hope to see you comment more so I can giggle every time I read one.The Cuckening is here!
There was a panel, fairly early on as I recall, where DFW took numbers 1, 2 and like 13. 13 had an article 60 attached.Evidence please. Show where they have chosen someone ranked lower on a list, and not because the people above them could no longer be selected because of the of their facility already releasing someone.
so one example, but then the contract was followed. and it was early.....anyone else want to take a shot?There was a panel, fairly early on as I recall, where DFW took numbers 1, 2 and like 13. 13 had an article 60 attached.
Tomorrow around noon. It’ll hit the KSN first then the NATCA website usually follows. It’ll definitely get posted here.will the list be available today or tomorrow? and where is it published, natca website?
The last one happened on a Friday so it was a weird scenario. It’s always the next business day but HR had updated the placement list before COB that dayLast NCEPT there was that dude who was posting facility releases/pick ups the day prior. Will that happen again?
Last panel the agency leaked the whole selection list early by accidentLast NCEPT there was that dude who was posting facility releases/pick ups the day prior. Will that happen again?
Valid A60 puts you at the top. That’s not a skipThere was a panel, fairly early on as I recall, where DFW took numbers 1, 2 and like 13. 13 had an article 60 attached.