Maintainvfr
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 528
I don't really think that guys post should have been removed. He didn't attack the OP, he just had a negative tone.
Anyone have any clue on how tough the competition is with ERRs to DTW? Have in for there but with it being so high I'm wondering if lots of others do as well.
Nice SN, I should change mine to "thankgodigotouttaaspen"Anyone have any clue on how tough the competition is with ERRs to DTW? Have in for there but with it being so high I'm wondering if lots of others do as well.
Yep they are all still there.Nice SN, I should change mine to "thankgodigotouttaaspen"
They still have the board with pictures of everyone's first day?
There is some type of hard to staff value that is present in the decision lense criteria formula but it doesn't appear to be hugely weighted. There are plenty of highly sought after, competitive facilities at the top of the priority list. And it appears to be the case that towers are still out prioritizing Tracon and Centers generally.Someone correct me if I am wrong but I think a part of what determines priority is how hard a place is to staff so this could mean not everyone is climbing all over each other to get there. Could be good for you lol
Well I think n90 ZNY and c90 are exceptions if you're trying to identify trends among regular facilities. I don't believe we're capable of seeing exactly what data determines that hard to staff value either.Hard to Staff Ratio is actual a .34 weighted. It is the largest determination for a facilities' priority on the Decision Lense. Hence why N90 and other places are always topped out on the lists.
do you think ERRreq is total ERR submissions or valid ERR submissions?The hard to staff equation is (Pot*ERRreq)/Gap
Pot is the potential for hard to staff which is essential any tracon or tower great or equal to a level 8 which gives it a 1 point. Centers dont rate.
ERRreq is the number of actual ERRs into a place, this is the only none ready information. Though I do assume the controller underground could find it.
Gap is the gap to the target number plus the non developmental losses.
It's on a sliding scale which determines a facilities priority, for HTS it makes up 34% of that value.
It's all in the NCEPT SOP.
The phraseology they use in the panel minutes is "valid" and I believe it encompasses ERRs that are in the queue for consideration. Meaning it's the number of ERRs that are from controllers eligible for release.What would make a submission valid versus invalid?
I can understand the 8 and above, as 7 and below are meant for academy entries and the entire thing is meant for upward movement. Whereas it's not just terminal level, the amount of people with packages into it are a multiplier which reduce the ratio versus the gap to target when there are more packages in.
The level is the least number really, the packages submitted are the important value which determines the most. Hence hard to staff.
No; I’m referencing the (I guess) 3rd Quarter panel.ERR submission deadline
March 14, 2019.
NCEPT Selection Meeting Date
April 16, 2019.
Is that what you were looking for?