HurryUpandWait
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 549
Is there any update or even rumors on CRWG implementation????
February (Q2) 2025
- Thread starter S.T.O.P.
- Start date
Pointsixtynine.10
Member
- Messages
- 33
They already hurried up with it now we gotta wait. You know?
WavesAndClouds
Trusted Contributor
- Messages
- 208
The bill reads they need to have it implemented within a year from when the most recent staffing plan came out and that was April.
HammerHead
Active Member
- Messages
- 112
They've been implementing it. AUS DSM MCO MDT so far. RDG and VGT numbers went down(might have been consolidation, idk anything about those facs).
When will they do your facility or the facility you're trying to get to? No idea. The plan was to do it bit by bit. I'm sure they wanted to get more than 4 facs bumped up by now but for whatever reason there's delays.
Acquired Taste
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 1,015
AUS, MCO, CMH, and VGT were the original 4 that got their numbers bumped up because they're old numbers were so far off what they actually needed, they were the biggest priority to get done immediately. From the sound of it, BNA probably should've been included in there too. The VGT target has not gone down from when it was adjusted up during the May 2024 ncept. The DSM number getting increased is very recent and I had not seen that one before. RDG got 804'd to MDT, hence the number changes there. AVP's target went up because the are absorbing BGM and ELM radar via 804 eventually but they can't get enough people to volunteer to go and they were releasing too many bodies so they had to stop the bleeding and start forcing some AG's their way. As for the rest of the implementation, I guess it'll happen when it happens. I can't remember if I heard on here or reddit or maybe it was in an email to make sure you have you're ERR paperwork in because they may start rolling these numbers out any panel now and it will affect who can gain/release.
SquawkHijack
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 626
DSM is currently going through an 804 with gaining the approach from ALO, so that may have bearing on their staffing in particular at the moment.
Last edited:
Prolly today
mcubed820
Member
- Messages
- 30
Updated ERR demand sheet is up on the NATCA website
Based off the rules neither facility would be able to pick up under Rd 1 since both are over 90% projected.
Once rd 2 starts both facilities can pick up to 110% projected staffing and they would go by order of their priority ranking. MCO is at 100.2% projected and T75 is 96.5% projected. MCO is ranked 103 and T75 is ranked 194. So in Rd 2 MCO would get to pick first then T75 and then repeat to 110% projected or they run out of ERRs to choose from
That's how I understand it
bravounite33
Trusted Contributor
- Messages
- 197
The ranking of the facilities is off a formula that takes into account the criticality to the NAS, health of the facility, and how hard to staff the facility is. Who knows what the actual formula is but it’s supposedly based off that. I know NATCA fought to get facility health more priority than criticality to the NAS a few years ago to get some lower facilities up higher but that’s all I know about. The rankings have nothing to do with who can actually pick though as that’s where the NCEPT rules for the panel come in.
HurryUpandWait
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 549
We’ve been saying that for 6 years
SadlyAUnionMember
Active Member
- Messages
- 119
When should the selection list be published?
I heard tomorrow at 1pm central from a reliable source. But when it comes to NCEPT things can always be delayed
Raise when?
Legendary Member
- Messages
- 736
Thanks, Shithead
It’s 1 eastern
