Does anyone know if the recent NCEPT changes will have an effect on prior exp placements. I'm just curious to see since there were basically no round 2 selections, will those facilities still get people of the prior exp bid?
Does anyone know if you can ERR from a 2152 Headquarters position to CPC if you were CPC prior to the HQ position?
I've seen ERRs out of HQ/Region for other 2152 positions. They weren't into a CPC position though. Most common is just submitting applications through USAJobs.Does anyone know if you can ERR from a 2152 Headquarters position to CPC if you were CPC prior to the HQ position?
Question. At the bottom of these charts, are "Selections" & "Releases" from this past panel/PPT? Or are they projected/needed?
View attachment 2571
The numbers under Cat 1 and Cat 2, do you need that number plus one more to release someone? Or once you hit whatever number under Cat 2 allows you to let one go?
9 and under might be wrong since they are changing the way the do them. My sheets took into account staffing to 100%. Ill change it if they ever actually say what they're going to do.Question. At the bottom of these charts, are "Selections" & "Releases" from this past panel/PPT? Or are they projected/needed?
View attachment 2571
There's a column in the placement tool labeled "CPC on Temp" as well as one labeled "CPC on Long Term Hold".Does anyone know how temp assignments in the facility of 180 days are treated regarding the AOB CPC numbers? Do they stay in the AOB or are they removed?
Same question for temp FLM assignments. Do they stay in the AOB?
I've searched the forum and can't find the answer.
There's a column in the placement tool labeled "CPC on Temp" as well as one labeled "CPC on Long Term Hold".
The current number of CPCs won't change if there's someone on either a temporary assignment or a long term hold, however it will affect the "Current CPC To Target" percentage down by however many people are on temp/hold status. Also negatively impacts the "Projected % To Target" column.
CPC number (minus temps/holds) then divided by the CPC target number will give the current CPC percentage.
They can't bypass the release policy unless they get a deviation approved into a permanent position.Thanks for the info. I guess I don't understand why someone on a 180 day temp would ever be subtracted since they can bypass the release policy in the first place.
Or they can just assign them another 180 day temp assignment at the end of the first one, lots of ways for them to work around that.They can't bypass the release policy unless they get a deviation approved into a permanent position.
Say they take a 180-day temp supervisor position at their facility, and then is selected as a permanent supervisor (either at same facility or another facility.) They don't get an automatic release unless that facility is able to release per the release policy. The deviation can be denied and they'll return to CPC-world at the end of the temp 180 days.
They can't bypass the release policy unless they get a deviation approved into a permanent position.
Say they take a 180-day temp supervisor position at their facility, and then is selected as a permanent supervisor (either at same facility or another facility.) They don't get an automatic release unless that facility is able to release per the release policy. The deviation can be denied and they'll return to CPC-world at the end of the temp 180 days.
They still show as a CPC in the building, but also show in the column for "CPC on Temp."I was referring to the 180 temp assignment. That does not fall under the national release policy, right? If that is the case then they should not be subtracted from CPC numbers. This 180 temp I am referring to cannot be extended or made permanent.
Why hasn't any news come out from last week's meeting/mock panel? I thought we'd be hearing about forthcoming changes and the next panel date.