May (Q2) 2021

Any way to figure out where facilities fall in the releases side off this?
For Round 1, you can release until AOB (column L) falls below 85%. For Round 2, you can release until AOB (column L) falls below the national average (81%-ish) or until projected (column AA) falls below 105%, whichever happens first.

I don't know if they'll recalculate the column L average each time (i.e. taking into account the current releases) or if they'll lock that number to 81% at the beginning of the whole process. Either way, 105% projected is a pretty high bar.
 
So it says on the spreadsheet on the values on the top bar that 80.1% is the national average for Current CPC’s and 91.0% is the national average for Projected column? Am I getting the values right on this?

For Round 1, you can release until AOB (column L) falls below 85%. For Round 2, you can release until AOB (column L) falls below the national average (81%-ish) or until projected (column AA) falls below 105%, whichever happens first.

I don't know if they'll recalculate the column L average each time (i.e. taking into account the current releases) or if they'll lock that number to 81% at the beginning of the whole process. Either way, 105% projected is a pretty high bar.

We wondering here since we have the numbers for Round 2 on what facilities can pick up? No one has in for the facilities below 85% (Round 1)
 
So it says on the spreadsheet on the values on the top bar that 80.1% is the national average for Current CPC’s and 91.0% is the national average for Projected column? Am I getting the values right on this?
91.04% is the current projected national average. It’ll most likely change next month.
 
We wondering here since we have the numbers for Round 2 on what facilities can pick up? No one has in for the facilities below 85% (Round 1)
The way I read the NATCA PDF: for Round 2, facilities are eligible to gain if they have less than 30% trainees and they are below the national AOB average (currently 81%). Such facilities are filled until their projected reaches the national average (curently 91.0%). As Super Salt says, both those averages will change on the final PPT run.

For Round 1 they'll be doing some fancy algorithmic Decision Lens mumbo-jumbo to rank the gaining facilities that's different from how they've done it in the past. For Round 2 it'll be simpler, they just start at the facility with lowest projected and work up from the bottom.

I don't have any special knowledge, this is just my interpretation of the NATCA document.

That’s how I was interpreting it too.
Yeah the wording is, as always, nonsensical and confusing. The actual quote:

Gaining facility must be below 85% AOB and projected national averages

...note that the document has a strikethrough on the final "s"! Because simply removing it would be too much work. Oy vey.

I interpret that to mean: 1) current AOB is below 85% and 2) projected AOB is below national projected AOB average. But I can definitely see how you're interpreting it to mean: 1) current AOB is below 85% and 2) projected AOB is below 85%. Standard agency/union clusterfuck. Wait and see, I guess.
 
The way I read the NATCA PDF: for Round 2, facilities are eligible to gain if they have less than 30% trainees and they are below the national AOB average (currently 81%). Such facilities are filled until their projected reaches the national average (curently 91.0%). As Super Salt says, both those averages will change on the final PPT run.

For Round 1 they'll be doing some fancy algorithmic Decision Lens mumbo-jumbo to rank the gaining facilities that's different from how they've done it in the past. For Round 2 it'll be simpler, they just start at the facility with lowest projected and work up from the bottom.

I don't have any special knowledge, this is just my interpretation of the NATCA document.


Yeah the wording is, as always, nonsensical and confusing. The actual quote:



...note that the document has a strikethrough on the final "s"! Because simply removing it would be too much work. Oy vey.

I interpret that to mean: 1) current AOB is below 85% and 2) projected AOB is below national projected AOB average. But I can definitely see how you're interpreting it to mean: 1) current AOB is below 85% and 2) projected AOB is below 85%. Standard agency/union clusterfuck. Wait and see, I guess.
Projected national average is currently about 91%.
That’s how I was interpreting it too.
Projected national average is currently about 91%
I interpret it as 85% for AOB and 85% for projected, but I also don't know shit.
Projected national average is currently about 91%
 
The way I read the NATCA PDF: for Round 2, facilities are eligible to gain if they have less than 30% trainees and they are below the national AOB average (currently 81%). Such facilities are filled until their projected reaches the national average (curently 91.0%). As Super Salt says, both those averages will change on the final PPT run.

For Round 1 they'll be doing some fancy algorithmic Decision Lens mumbo-jumbo to rank the gaining facilities that's different from how they've done it in the past. For Round 2 it'll be simpler, they just start at the facility with lowest projected and work up from the bottom.

I don't have any special knowledge, this is just my interpretation of the NATCA document.


Yeah the wording is, as always, nonsensical and confusing. The actual quote:



...note that the document has a strikethrough on the final "s"! Because simply removing it would be too much work. Oy vey.

I interpret that to mean: 1) current AOB is below 85% and 2) projected AOB is below national projected AOB average. But I can definitely see how you're interpreting it to mean: 1) current AOB is below 85% and 2) projected AOB is below 85%. Standard agency/union clusterfuck. Wait and see, I guess.
The “removed averages” to now just “average” (strike through “s”) must have been done overnight, because it was not like that yesterday ?
 
The “removed averages” to now just “average” (strike through “s”) must have been done overnight, because it was not like that yesterday ?
They watching u
I See You Reaction GIF by Spellbreak
 
It's looking more and more like the nuclear option (quitting the agency for 6 months) is the only chance some of us have.
 
Back
Top Bottom