Exactly, the right thing for once. They always run the numbers after the ERR deadline to “use the most updated information,” which always seemed ridiculous to me considering the significant shifts in priority that take place. So now they have integrity?It’s fair for the people that met the requirements had the panel been held as scheduled. Imagine if you could release someone at that panel but had a change in the numbers after that and you were no longer eligible? That would screw you over so they avoided that and did the right thing for once
Here’s another integrity question: These NATCA people who pushed so hard for NCEPT are voted for by members. I have not met one controller (aside from NATCA big wigs trying to support all union decisions) who thinks it’s a good process. Why are they not listening to their constituents? Didn’t we trust them to make decisions for the good of the members? It’s been over 5 years and the hatred for this thing is only growing. Why are they sticking to this so aggressively? Ok, you can’t please everybody, but that doesn’t mean you have to royally piss off everybody, either.