August (Q4) 2022

I have a PPT dated 07/20/22, have no clue how to post it though.

The monthly PPT that comes out today is not the PPT that will be used for the NCEPT.
Yeah I just realized that.. but this one that comes out and the other for the ncept wouldn't be too far off numbers wise I think
 
If anyone has today’s PPT, would you mind posting? I’m on vacation this week and curious how my facility is trending before the “official” PPT is released.
 
I compiled the unofficial PPT from the KSN into this. Correct me if I'm wrong, but is our national projected really near 93%?
 

Attachments

  • Unofficial July 27th.xlsx
    37.8 KB · Views: 228
Nah it's about 88.5%
88.4% on the last PPT but when I run the average on the unofficial it comes out to just under 93% somehow.

Granted the unofficial is missing some numbers including training success and expected to certify amounts.
 
Last edited:
88.4% on the last PPT but when I run the average on the unofficial it comes out to just under 93% somehow.

Granted the unofficial is missing some numbers including training success and expected to certify amounts.
The average is skewed. Low level facilities with fewer CPCs have better staffing while high level places with high CPC targets have poor staffing.
 
The average is skewed. Low level facilities with fewer CPCs have better staffing while high level places with high CPC targets have poor staffing.
I notice they take the sum of all the facility numbers up top, then run the national average calculation based off that.

Rather than run an average of the facility percentages.

This is how the 88.4 is generated as opposed to the 92.8.
 
88.4% on the last PPT but when I run the average on the unofficial it comes out to just under 93% somehow.

Granted the unofficial is missing some numbers including training success and expected to certify amounts.
The unofficial staffing data on the ksn web page is abbreviated. Your projected staffing to target calculations will be inaccurate because that page only has some of the columns that create projected staffing.
 
The August monthly PPT is out (not the one used for the NCEPT). I've looked at the numbers, and it's a little interesting.

edit: my spreadsheet messed up... there are facilities that can release in round 2. actual number will be determined in the upcoming PPT.

There are 18 facilities that can either gain or release in Round 1, so I'm not sure how that will be handled since the facilities can only do one or the other according to the rules.
 
Last edited:
The August monthly PPT is out (not the one used for the NCEPT). I've looked at the numbers, and it's a little interesting.

Round 2 will not exist if they follow the rules that have been laid out and the numbers stay the same. No facility meets the level 4-7, 90% current CPC, 100% projected target.

There are 18 facilities that can either gain or release in Round 1, so I'm not sure how that will be handled since the facilities can only do one or the other according to the rules.
It’s almost as if they made the rules so that nobody can transfer.
 
The August monthly PPT is out (not the one used for the NCEPT). I've looked at the numbers, and it's a little interesting.

Round 2 will not exist if they follow the rules that have been laid out and the numbers stay the same. No facility meets the level 4-7, 90% current CPC, 100% projected target.

There are 18 facilities that can either gain or release in Round 1, so I'm not sure how that will be handled since the facilities can only do one or the other according to the rules.
When does the PPT they will use for the August NCEPT come out?
 
The August monthly PPT is out (not the one used for the NCEPT). I've looked at the numbers, and it's a little interesting.

Round 2 will not exist if they follow the rules that have been laid out and the numbers stay the same. No facility meets the level 4-7, 90% current CPC, 100% projected target.

There are 18 facilities that can either gain or release in Round 1, so I'm not sure how that will be handled since the facilities can only do one or the other according to the rules.
Cue ?dynamic decisions?
 
Back
Top Bottom