May (Q3) 2024

[boots]

Love to see it. Thank you NATCA.

 

[Spiralbox21]

I will never be able to leave my place bro if we have to get 6 more people. When does this go in effect?

 

[32andBelow]

You get the immediate negative effects from CRWG and then get to pray the potential positive improvements every happen. Yay.

 

[AB19]

 

[32andBelow]

The hold bad news to Friday afternoon is a classic.

 

[Bobson Dugnutt]

Are you saying that they changed the staffing numbers for MCO, CMH, and VGT for this panel after they were frozen? No fucking way

Decided to implement CRWG numbers for a select few facilities (but not all facilities) therefore putting them below 85% and making them ineligible to release.

 

[32andBelow]

Idk how you do that without lowering the nat average

 

[XrayMike]

Decided to implement CRWG numbers for a select few facilities (but not all facilities) therefore putting them below 85% and making them ineligible to release.

where is this information coming from? Is this just leaked info from the panel? Or speculation?

 

[Bobson Dugnutt]

where is this information coming from? Is this just leaked info from the panel? Or speculation?

From my region RVP

 

[TangoBearFox]

Idk how you do that without lowering the nat average

Last week Biden signed the FAA reauthorization, so maybe they are already implementing the CRWG numbers, got to be implemented within 6 months so why not start now. Super Dynamic!

 

[ajmezz]

Is there a list of facilities that increased their staffing number?

 

[Phanatical]

Is there a list of facilities that increased their staffing number?

This is the May PPT with CRWG Numbers included. VGT was the highest bump percentage wise.

If you open that Excel spreadsheet, the CRWG numbers are in there. I've included increasing/decreasing numbers as well as percentages. There are some hidden columns where you can see the CIC add-on numbers in addition to the true CRWG number.

 

[JCC]

Guy on the NCEPT panel told me the projected national average that they used this panel was 84.9

 

[32andBelow]

Last week Biden signed the FAA reauthorization, so maybe they are already implementing the CRWG numbers, got to be implemented within 6 months so why not start now. Super Dynamic!

Yes but if you implement the new numbers then we no longer have 85% average

 

[TangoBearFox]

Yes but if you implement the new numbers then we no longer have 85% average

The new numbers are absolutely devastating to some low level facilities.

 

[32andBelow]

The new numbers are absolutely devastating to some low level facilities.

The new numbers make no sense. They act like we were at 100% before and understaffed. They never even tried out the old numbers

 

[Phanatical]

Yes but if you implement the new numbers then we no longer have 85% average

CRWG numbers projected national average is 76.39%

The new numbers are absolutely devastating to some low level facilities.

With new numbers:

One facility is below 50% projected: HLN (49.7%)
109 facilities are below 70% projected
210 facilities are below 80% projected
260 facilities are below the current PNA of 85.33%
7 facilities are above 100% projected

 

[GroundClutter]

With new numbers:

One facility is below 50% projected: HLN (49.7%)
109 facilities are below 70% projected
210 facilities are below 80% projected
260 facilities are below the current PNA of 85.33%
7 facilities are above 100% projected

The transfer system is robust and works as intended.

 

[32andBelow]

CRWG numbers projected national average is 76.39%

So shouldn’t everyone above the new 76 be able to release?

 

[TangoBearFox]

So shouldn’t everyone above the new 76 be able to release?

Well that be optimistic, I wouldn't take that bet.